Pages

Tuesday, 26 January 2021

Has the Mandalorian Kept Discovery Honest?


Discovery's third season has closed and with it, the most experimental and riskiest season in over fifty years and certainly far from its best.

Before you start gulping raktajinos just to spit them out in sudden disgust, I’m not trashing Star Trek, nor am I making any sharp right turn and vowing never to watch another episode ever again. The rebooting of Discovery meant that season three effectively did the same as the ship and became "-A", beginning the universe building again that was evident back in The Vulcan Hello.
 
The other thing is that it's hard not to compare this year with the return of Disney's Star Wars offering in the form of The Mandalorian, season two. 

After a rather mixed sequel trilogy that started well with A New Hope reboot The Force Awakens, The Last Jedi turned it all on its head brilliantly. Tragically JJ Abrams, who did so well with kicking Star Trek back into life chose to play it super safe with The Rise of Skywalker. 

It looked like Star Trek could get a little cocky. The reboot movies, on the whole, were well received and Discovery, Picard and Lower Decks were opening the franchise to a whole new set of viewers and annoying loads of the older ones at the same time. Yet, it was going in the right direction and attracting a lot of attention.

It was flashy, it was edgy, the effects were incredible and there was clearly a lot of money sunk into the product. Discovery was complex, offering a new mystery each season - Lorca, the Red Angel, the Burn; something for us to follow week on week. Each episode gave a bit more and attempted to question something and tie itself in to modern day issues but it became reliant on you having to keep up each week. Picard might as well have been a political commentary on the state of the US at times which, if you think back, is sort of the lavish, want-for-nothing opposite that The Next Generation pitched up with in 1987.

Discovery and Picard are definitely not The Next Generation or Deep Space Nine just in the way that those shows weren’t the same as The Original Series. It’s ok to love one, maybe like another and perhaps just enjoy watching Enterprise (for example!). So-called Nu-Trek (ie post 2009) at the least continues the tradition of being controversial but may be burying its allegories a lot deeper than even Gene Roddenberry did. 

Discovery is pushing the boundaries, adding transgender characters, an alien captain, the focus on one main character, huge story arcs, that time jump. Perhaps its agenda in that way is more open than any Star Trek series ever before although it’s trying to appeal to everyone and by default may actually be trying that little bit too hard.

The Mandalorian meanwhile is demonstrating the old KISS principle; Keep It Simple Stupid. Set something up, show it, leave it, return and give a one line reminder. Job done. But more importantly you can dip into this series without worrying too much about what's gone before.  However, is that what fans would want from Star Trek or, as I expect, is there a higher bar to reach with its extensive back catalogue and experience? Rumour has it that the Trek franchise is even considering utilising that rather impressive AI wall technology that has given the Mandalorian a stunning visual look and a huge storytelling advantage.

There's no requirement for a deep and intimate knowledge of the story on The Mandalorian because nothing is over thought. As I saw one review state, it's exactly the story you would be telling if you were dreaming something up with your tub of action figures. But let's remember they are two very different franchises and however much I love The Mandalorian, Star Trek still has a firm grip on my affections but that doesn't mean it can avoid my disappointment.

I can honestly say that if I didn't follow each week of this season of Discovery religiously to find out the next bit of information about the Burn or the Emerald Chain, I would find it difficult to follow. It does limit its re-watch potential and that's something that the '66 - '01 era definitely wins at and should be rectified with the introduction of Strange New Worlds which will be more contained to a story per episode.

The age of the binge-watch does suit the arc nature of the show because you'll be in the loop right to the end. In this way, Star Trek is trying to cater to two types of audience within its framework but... with The Mandalorian a dip in and out or a full re-watch are easily possible and it may well be failing to capture the hearts of the established audience to build itself a new fanbase. Being brutal, for longevity this has to happen and Star Trek needs new fans to keep it alive. These new fans don't have the same mentality as the 1966 or 1987 audience and, love or hate it, they are the future.

With a basic set up, each episode of The Mandalorian still remains fairly self-contained with a specific event. Journeys to different planets are done in a screen wipe (something the spore drive in Discovery now helps with) and importantly it knows what it is, an action series set in space. Star Trek - no, specifically Discovery - is trying to be more. All encompassing and perhaps overstretching itself. Even in my reviews of the show I can feel a dissatisfaction in some of its elements. Burnham is over emotional, characters are under-developed and the genuine cool twist of dropping the viewer into the distant future hasn't created quite the buzz I expected.

There's an overreliance on nods to the past - Voyager, Spock (twice!) and instead of carving out that new, fresh path, the concern to bow to the older generation of fans may now be taking its toll and holding the show back. Homages and references are great but the back catalogue may now be proving to be more of an anchor-weight for Discovery than ever before. Season four has to go boldly where no-one has gone before and explore the 32nd Century as well as bringing the Federation back together. Rebuild and solidify the optimism for today. 

I'm enjoying Discovery as a show but the excitement is missing from a great deal of the episodes in what may well be remembered as Star Trek's most disappointing season ever. It came, it saw, it didn't deliver the thrills we were expecting. Osyraa turned out to be one of Trek's most multifaceted villains and is more than just a baddie toting a gun or wanting to recite poetry on every kill. Her plans are wider, her vision bigger however the plot for the Emerald Chain was lacking. It started the season as a sub-plot but grew to overtake the Burn as the priority of the year. Maybe the only thing lacking was a better way of having her switch from baddie to negotiator and back to baddie in the final pair of episodes.

The Mandalorian didn't go too far. While Discovery was revealing that an errant child was responsible for the downfall of the galaxy (sounds like a parallel to the Ewoks defeating the Empire), it remained focused on a simple rescue mission. It was exciting, it was different because the series had done away with any sub-text, attempts at making social comment or being that little bit too clever.

However, with an additional five episodes over the season length of The Mandalorian, Discovery has managed to do a lot more this year than perhaps it tried to do in years one and two. The bridge crew feel a little bit more fleshed out and recognisable. They're been given more to do this year than push a few buttons and arm the torpedoes or raise a hail. 

Even in the finale, That Hope is You, Part II there's a lot going on but we still have time for part of the episode to follow their narrative. Having that burgeoning cast has not been a friend to the show and if you look to The Mandalorian, the main cast is only a handful of characters each week which again declutters the script and the action. Being only 30 minutes long also has the effect of keeping it on the line from start to finish while Discovery's 50-60 minute run time allows for more expansion of character and story. 

I'm not suggesting that happens every week although I do think the jump to the future is a way for the series to up its game, show that the studio are putting decent money into the show and have enough faith in it that they were prepared to start again. It's been a testing year and the show has run against Star Wars directly on its release days which piles even more pressure. The limp few episodes towards the end of season three did Discovery no favours. Georgiou's send off did not need to be a two-parter and elements of the Book storyline with his home world and the Emerald Chain may have helped build a bigger picture of the thuggish organisation but even now I'm not sure if it was all worth it. 

Essentially though there had to be an episode here to fully introduce both Adira and Book to the viewer and to a greater extent it's been worth it when it's come to the later episodes around Gray and that final twist that Book can now work the spore drive. Give it this, Discovery has not in any way played it safe this season - the time, the place, the foes, the twists - all have gone against expectation. If I recall it was the fired previous producers who promised that optimism and it looks like their thoughts for the year were binned (but I can't substantiate that, it's a theory!). That's left us with this grimy, darker season that actually tried new things, went for new character options and did it all in the middle of a global pandemic.  

Finally though, perhaps we ourselves as viewers have come to expect too much from Discovery hence why The Mandalorian has been so refreshing. It has nothing to prove, the franchise's movies have been less than stellar of late and inversely there's nothing to lose from attempting a live action show. 

With that 800 episode total, fans expect perfection and "their" Star Trek. Nay, they demand it and want The Next Generation or for the next episode to be as if the franchise had continued on TV in 2006. But it won't be and y'know I can live with that because it's a new era and once again things change. No-one can be pleased all the time and I can count several DS9's or Voyager's that bombed in my eyes. Discovery is no different and ultimately while I can bemoan the dips in quality, it's unavoidable.

Who is to say that now The Mandalorian has closed off the Grogu storyline it'll be anywhere near as effective? We won't know for two years since Boba Fett is off on his own quest next year but everything has its day, its highs and lows so I'm sticking around with Trek - there are always...possibilities.

Like our page on Facebook 
Follow us on Twitter
Find us on Tumblr 

All images CBS All Access

6 comments:

  1. Sadly, Star Trek has jumped the shark. Especially with it's ludicrous turbo-lifts, the insanity of a 'red angel suit', magic mushrooms, indestructible bulkheads, Orc Klingons, to name just a few issues. Then there's the producers love of Space Hitler, a character that everyone seemed to suddenly have loved?

    Yeah, I’m disillusioned. Star Trek was rarely ‘hard SF’ like The Expanse and always had some fantasy elements, but they really used to try to make things make sense ‘in Universe’. They employed real physicists and other Science consultants, so you had things like the Heisenberg compensator that allowed the transporter to work and Stephen Hawking talking about how warp drive could work. Nerds like me used to get the deck plans (did you know there are dolphins on the Enterprise D? – well there are in ‘Cetacean Ops’. The designers on classic Trek were all aeronautical engineers, but now I guess they just employ CGI artists and so you get generic SF ships, ‘Sploshions and it all has to look cool rather than realistic. Modern Star Trek apes Star Wars, it’s now all about the spectacle – which is great for Star Wars, but not so much for Star Trek.

    I was watching an old re-run of The Next Generation and it’s a pretty believable future. The sets have that nice, even TV lighting, rather than the cavernous dark and edgy sets of Discovery. I know where I’d rather serve on a long voyage. The bridge is carpeted, there’s a bar and the people on the ship are all rational scientists exploring the universe. There’s even a counsellor to help you cope with the long space flight. Even down to things like the chairs and the consoles, which look comfy and useable. Serving on Discovery would be a living nightmare on the bridge, which is dark and enormous with crazy bright displays that’d soon give you a headache. On Discovery, there’s so much crying and whispering of dialog and its so irrational. Darren – tell me why Burnham was made Captain in the final episode? She’s disloyal and can’t follow orders. And why was Tilly (an ensign – literally the lowest rank - promoted to First Officer over all the more qualified staff?

    And then there’s all the shooting and killing and space battles and loud background music. If you watch the old stuff, that’s not what Star Trek is about. Leave that to Star Wars, which does a far better job with it. Look at the Mandalorian, which embraces everything that made A New Hope a masterpiece. Then look at Discovery, which basically says lets reject what came before because its too cheesy for modern audiences. The Mandalorian on the other hand embraces the cheesy 70’s creatures even made the weird assassin droid thing look badass.

    In other geek news – that I doubt anyone cares about, Babylon 5 has been remastered in HD. Crap acting aside, this series was amazing at the time for its pioneering use of CGI – and the story was incredible.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi James!!! Missed your comments so it's great to see you back!

    The turbolift sequence really, really did it for me. I've just finished reading the "Vision of the Future" book about Voyager from the 90's and it's all about consistency, believability, care, attention, precision and keeping on track with the franchise. Rick Berman's involvement was incredible on a day to day, second by second basis (if we go by the book) and Discovery, possibly moreso Picard are no longer taking that care.

    You're spot on in regards to it becoming more of a fake Star Wars but I think that programmes such as Game of Thrones, Breaking Bad and a few others have had such an influence on TV writing that the writers of Trek now believe that's what we want to see. Who will live or die this week? Everyone's expendable!

    Disco truly stretched it with Burnham's captaincy and Tilly's XO position. The believability and trust ebbed from me in what could and should have been a truly monumental and groundbreaking season of Star Trek. It's honouring the past less and less and at the same tie making JJ's films look like a lost opportunity. Even when i clicked "post" for this one I struggled with whether I'd got it right... or wrong or was being too horrid to a franchise that I do truly love but Disco has left me feeling a bit empty and that hopeful future we were promised and given by Gene Roddenberry is a long, long way away.

    I had spotted B5 now upgraded which is excellent news. I have the complete set on DVD and even though some of it can be excruciating to watch it is still a fine piece of TV and beautifully planned ... at least for the first four seasons!!!

    Again, thanks for your comments. I will still watch Disco for s4 but my expectations now are moderate to low. The depth and rewatch factor just don't hit it. Pass me Spock's Brain anyday!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great article Clive, and very fairly written. On the Mandalorian – I have enjoyed it immensely and, in fact, it has made a Star Wars fan out of me (I only watched the movies quite casually before).
    After viewing Star Trek Discovery (Seasons 1 and 2) and Picard (Season 1), I had the opposite reaction and steered well clear of modern Trek. For so many reasons (your other commenter mentions the egregious turbolift rollercoaster!), but mainly it’s the characters. I’ve simply never warmed up to them. The crying. The unearned emotions. Tig Notaro and her so called wit.
    I was initially excited about the Disco season 3 reboot but gave up after the first episode of the season and consumed the show via various review sites (yours among them). I’m glad that I did as the resolution to the Burn mystery sounds awfully disappointing and Tilly’s promotion beggars belief!
    I get that I am part of the “old guard” of fandom – I really do. And I would never actively criticise someone who chose to watch Discovery/Picard. Hell! I’m envious! I *wish* I could be excited about those shows, but I’ve started to wonder if so called modern Trek is for me? The lack of re-watchability is a huge factor for me as well as I often enjoy taking a random Trek episode off the shelf and enjoying it on its own merits. Oh well, happy to live and let live…

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was so excited for Discovery and even more so for Picard. Generally, I haven't commented here or over on TrekCore and TrekMovie, because I don't want to be 'that hater guy'. I tried to watch Lower Decks, but I just can't get through it. I'll probably keep watching Picard and Discovery, but it's not essential TV for me anymore. I much prefer The Expanse and yes, even The Orville at the moment. This guy sums up my problems with DSC:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLaQiTjHHSA

      Delete
    2. Thanks gents for your comments - sorry it's taken a while to reply!!!

      It's becoming harder to not get to a point where you object to something or feel there's something negative going to slip out at times. Trek simply isn't the same as it was in the 90's. Problem is the reaction you get even if you attempt to be constructive in your criticism. In fact, a friend of mine commented on how the Ent-F Odyssey Class must now be canon on an FB post and got a load of abuse hurled at him just for expressing an opinion. Has fandom gone beyond the level of toxicity that you could even class as moderately bareable? I stay pretty clear of reddit, wegotthiscovered, doomcock et all due to their horrendous track record of rumours and subsequent "fan" arguments. The Trek community is irreparably splintered now with three distinct generations of fans - '60s, '90s and '10s. The advent of Trek's need to pander to every group is shocking just, it feels, to avoid any form of backlash.
      Season 3 of Disco just failed when it should have been the start of a peak. The Burn, Tilly and ultimately Burnham as captain just don't ring true to the experience of Star Trek. Paris got demoted for less than Michael, Kim was a far better officer and never made Lt. By trying to adhere to the multitude of 21st Century tickboxes, Discovery has perhaps lost the true meaning of Christmas if you will.

      Delete
  4. I, like you, have really refrained from too much commenting. I *really* dont wanna be the guy who gets online and spews hatred about a show (and also upsets legitimate fans of said show).
    But yeah - everything you've said I agree with. The Icheb "eye gauging" scene was the final straw for me. So awful (and I say that as a bona fide horror fan). Its just now what I want to feel when I watch Trek.
    And yes - I'm a fan of Major Grin - who often uses his editorial skills to devastating effect!!

    ReplyDelete