In the first of a two part retrospective, Matt Goddard turns back the clock to 1995 as he ventures into the Delta Quadrant to relive the initial season of Star Trek's fourth incarnation as he begins a seven season rewatch...
So how does Star Trek: Voyager Series 1 shape up? A Year of Hell, displaying Lifesigns or signalling Future’s End..?
This post comes with an air of inevitability, just like
Voyager making its way home. Was that ever
in doubt? It might be if Voyager was made today, but times have
changed. When the third Star Trek live action sequel series
started, it wasn't immediately evident, but each of its forebears had laid down
an impressive gauntlet. As Voyager met
her fate in the Badlands, Deep Space Nine
was still in its infancy, but the intervening years have seen its stock rise
considerably. Of course, the other Star Trek series had achieved incredible
success in their own lifetime on the small and large screen - but viewers of
the awkward Deep Space Nine were
always a little more partisan.
Earlier this year I completed a long and leisurely retrospective
of that Deep Space vintage. It was so
leisurely that the Federation could have discovered the Dominion and kicked off
a war in the same three year timeframe it took me to complete all seven series. Satisfyingly however, the conclusion came in
this the show’s 20th anniversary year. Even more satisfyingly, it confirmed my
suspicions: Deep Space Nine is an incredible achievement. It took its position as the younger, difficult
brother of TNG, with cynical and audience
grabbing stunts and a flash new non-syndicated competitor and melded them with the
strengths of its strong cast to produce something really special. Something that Trekkies should be proud of. I might tell you about it some time, but you hopefully
know it already.
That’s the problem I had.
Fresh respect for Deep Space Nine. So for my next mission I was torn where I
should go. Jump backwards? Hmm, perhaps
forwards, ready to lap myself when Deep Space Nine makes it on to Blu-ray? I was at yellow
alert for some time before... Then I accidentally started watching Star Trek: Voyager.
1995
It was Caretaker I couldn’t resist. At the show’s launch in 1995 I read more
about Voyager than I had about any
other Trek show... The American import Star Trek Magazine, The Radio Times coverage, the Telegraph
article addressing Geneviève Bujold’s sudden departure. I dutifully bought pilot on VHS and waited
for the BBC to screen the full series... Only to find it on Sunday afternoons. Pretty inconvenient. The result was a distinct lack of fond
memories. Oh, I was familiar with
it. I watched the first couple of
seasons more than intermittently. I was
at university by the fifth season and was then routinely pulled back by the Borg
(and the founder of this blog I may add – still, as far as I’m aware, un-assimilated)
a couple of times after that.
But that’s where the inevitability comes in. I was always going to return to consider the
series in its totality one day... And
that day has come. I’ve just completed
the first, shortened season so I’m about a seventh of the way through... One of Seven sounds like a fairly average Borg,
but how does that first season stand up now?
Well, put simply, it’s not as bad as I remember. There are good points, as you’d hope with the
talent involved. It’s certainly
watchable, there’s some great acting and it’s more cohesive than I remember... But those points just serve to highlight the
opportunity that was missed. Unfortunately,
glaring problems are evident. Painfully
evident. My biggest challenge viewing Voyager now is to remove the 18 intervening
years of prejudice as well as a massively changed TV climate and scan the show anew.
Montagues & Capulets. And Neelix. |
Voyager’s Premise
A quick and unnecessary recap shows that Voyager marked a further simplification
of the Star Trek story. The five year
mission had turned into the continuing mission which led to Starfleet’s
incursions into the Gamma Quadrant and then led to a journey home. The Voyages of, er, Voyager. Not the Earth-threatening 20th
century satellite but the latest ship in the fleet, carrying bio-neural
circuitry, 42 photon torpedoes and the unexpected weight of a 75 year journey
back to Federation space with a skeleton crew of Montagues and Capulets.
It sounds interesting.
More so perhaps than a space-station orbiting a ravaged planet of
spiritual people. As Voyager’s so utterly in line with the
core exploration ideal of Star Trek,
it’s a shame that the comparison with Deep Space Nine necessarily comes up. The first two
seasons of that second sequel were hardly classics. In fact, of all the Star Trek shows, only The
Original Series has any claim to hitting the ground running. But at Voyager’s
launch, while Deep Space Nine was starting to
forge forward with genuine originality that would not only lay the path for Battlestar Galactica and all manner of other
arc shows but also inadvertently undo the grip of star ship shows on American
TV, Voyager was moving in the
opposite direction. And that perversely is
at odds with the format of that long journey home.
The ingredients were all there. The separation from the Federation, a whole
new quadrant almost entirely untouched and that single minded quest to return
home. One of the greatest one-sheet
pitches in Trek history surely? Deep
Space Nine got stick for its anti-exploration agenda, but DS9 personnel
could disappear for months infiltrating the Orion Syndicate or taking shore
leave on Earth. Not on Voyager. On that starship there were two nuanced
enemies forced to work together to find a way home against adversity.
The Star Trek Mould
The problem is that didn't quite work out that way. Perhaps the myth of Star Trek was too great.
There’s almost a sense that it had the potential to rock the Star Trek
ship too much. Perhaps it was a natural
response to Deep Space Nine’s early criticism,
perhaps a sign that too many Star Trek
stalwarts were involved, perhaps that too much rested on it as a launch show on
the brand new United Paramount Network. The show should have had more confidence to
break the mould for its own dramatic good.
The under-exploration of the Maquis rabble suddenly forced
into Starfleet uniforms was a major criticism levelled at the show when it
premiered. Another case of over
promising in pre-publicity, it’s up there with Doctor Who promising every Dalek ever in a season premiere... At the time I thought that Voyager had pursued diversity at all
costs, but I was wrong. There was
nothing especially wrong with that differentiation from previous shows. Yes, the Captain was female, the First Officer
a Native American, the Helmsman a criminal, the Security officer a full Vulcan
but it wasn't the diversity that was the issue.
The problem was the show's failure to confront and use that inherent
diversity.
"We're all in this together": State of Flux |
Why have the Maquis aboard if you are not going to use them
as the main fuel? Maquis issues had virtually dissipated by the end of the pilot and the unfortunate mantra “We’re all in
this together” (State of Flux) became a watch phrase for that under-explored dynamic. But it wasn't just the crew dynamics that were scuppered by the Star Trek mould.
The Voyager Sigh
Failing to adhere to a clear and direct mission, the Voyager ‘sigh’ quickly
developed. That’s the sigh that came
whenever an episode began with a variation of “We've taken a diversion from our
journey home to...”. With just the
slightest of pretences, too many stories of the first series are ones that
could have featured in any Star Trek show.
It’s an issue that Deep Space Nine soon
found a release from thanks to interesting arcs and the benefits of its static
soap-style locale. In Season One, Voyager
barely took its finger off the episode reset button. Each week, despite tackling profound issues
that could have carried serious weight, there was little arc implication. As the series progressed, it was easy to
forget that the ship was speeding along in one direction as the journey often felt
arbitrary in a format that gave it little concession.
This wasn’t just The Next Generation's early, harmless rip-offs of The Original Series shows like The Naked Time, but a horrid mix
of limited danger and repetition. Within
three episodes you had seen two incidents of multiple USS Voyagers and several rather
dull discussions about contravention of the Prime Directive. Incidents like this, possibly poor
scheduling, perpetuated the idea that Voyager lacked ideas, but the main
problem was they diluted the purity of its central story. Instead of creating danger, Voyager’s mission
decreased it. While the Prime Directive
seemed pointless from the beginning, the brig is constantly dismissed as a
luxury. All in all, that court martial
is a long way off.
Janeway's disciplinary technique meets the Voyager 'Sigh' |
Of course, Voyager
delved into the Holodeck, choosing to move away from Deep Space Nine‘s questionable suites to holonovels. While I’m mindful that the season split doesn't help, it looks half-developed. In
the last episode of Season 1, Janeway’s struggle as a governess in her holodeck
has clear parallels with Tuvok’s later tackling of the Maquis – but these aren't drawn out. Future seasons would
touch back on the brig, holonovels and the Prime Directive, but here I’m only
looking at the season that surfaced in 1995.
While Batman was simplifying
on the big screen, Star Trek simplified
on the small screen.
As with any Star Trek series, Voyager must be judged on the
strength of its characters, cast and plots.
In part two of this retrospective, I’ll look at those
elements as well as what went right and what went wrong...
Matt Goddard is a spectacularly accomplished writer, providing articles for the UK's Daily Mirror newspaper and in particular two pieces relating to the premiere of Star Trek Into Darkness earlier this year which can be found here and here. If you want you can follow his thoughts and meanderings on Twitter as @JokerMatt
You can read Part Two right now by following this handy link
Matt Goddard is a spectacularly accomplished writer, providing articles for the UK's Daily Mirror newspaper and in particular two pieces relating to the premiere of Star Trek Into Darkness earlier this year which can be found here and here. If you want you can follow his thoughts and meanderings on Twitter as @JokerMatt
You can read Part Two right now by following this handy link
No comments:
Post a Comment